Next to Abortion Ban, Same-Sex Marriage Review…, Samuel L. Jackson Sarcastically Criticizes, “What are you thinking?!”

Politics
スポンサーリンク

Last Updated on 06/28/2022 by てんしょく飯

 

Samuel L. Jackson criticized conservative justices for the U.S. Supreme Court’s failure to guarantee the right to abortion, which is about to infringe on the right to same-sex relationships.

 

スポンサーリンク

Abortion Ban Does Not Stop the Crisis of Deprivation of Various Rights in the U.S.

 

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which granted women the right to abortion in the United States, on June 24, 2022, and women’s right to abortion is no longer guaranteed by the Constitution. Conservative Donald Trump nominated three Supreme Court justices during his term as president, so that of the nine U.S. Supreme Court justices who are serving life terms, six are conservatives and three are liberals, making the Supreme Court more conservative-leaning.

 

In addition, Clarence Thomas, a conservative and a Supreme Court justice since 1991, in his opinion on the ruling, noted that the Court’s 1965 decision in Griswold v. Connecticut, which recognized the right to contraception, the 2003 decision in Lawrence v. Texas, which recognized the right to same-sex sexual intercourse, and the He has caused quite a stir by writing that the “Obergfell v. Hodges” decision, which recognized the right to same-sex marriage in 2015, should be reviewed.

 

Thomas wrote, “Because any substantive due process decision is ‘clearly erroneous,’ we have an obligation to ‘correct the errors’ established by those precedents.

 

Samuel L. Jackson criticizes the judge

 

No man is infallible. But the way Thomas speaks, it seems as if he is absolute. In this context, actor Samuel L. Jackson’s opinion is gaining support. He commented on Twitter after the “Roe v. Wade” decision was overturned.

 

How’s Uncle Clarence feeling about Overturning Loving v Virginia??!!

The “Loving v. Virginia” case was the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1967 decision recognizing marriage between a white man and a black man. Thomas, who is black, married his wife, who is white, in 1987, and they have been married 35 years this year. If, as Justice Clarence says, past precedents should be reviewed, it is not surprising that the “Loving v. Virginia” decision should also be reviewed, but Mr. Thomas has not mentioned the case.

 

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren said, “Clarence Thomas makes it clear. The far right does not end with abortion. They will go after marriage equality, contraception, and those who don’t fit & live up to their ideal American ideas. But the Supreme Court does not make the final decision. The American people do. “As noted, the current situation can rightly be criticized as conservative justices with a majority on the Supreme Court trampling human rights to their own good.

 

Jim Obergfell, one of the plaintiffs in the “Obergfell v. Hodges” case, expressed his outrage in an interview with People.

 

He said, “Clarence Thomas is a Supreme Court justice appointed by man, he is not the supreme deity. Millions of loving couples who have an equal right to marriage, to have families of their own, do not deserve to be forced into Clarence Thomas’ mangled personal morality. If you want to see something called wrong judgment, Clarence Thomas, look in the mirror.”

 

The consequences of Trump’s actions during his presidency have erupted in many negative ways. Not only in the U.S., but the world today makes one feel that human rights and the lives of the people will collapse at once if the people do not face politics. In Japan, the House of Councillors election to be held on July 10 will have a major impact on the future of society. Whether the results will be good or bad is the responsibility of the people.

 

 

コメント

タイトルとURLをコピーしました