Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Wants Amber Heard’s ‘Nude Photos’ and ‘Stripper Days’ Revealed in Court

スポンサーリンク
Entertainment

Last Updated on 08/06/2022 by てんしょく飯

 

 

Johnny Depp’s lawyer wanted to present nude photos of Amber Heard and the fact that she worked as a stripper in the past as “evidence” in his lawsuit against his ex-wife for defamation.

 

スポンサーリンク

Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Tried to Bring “Amber Heard’s Past” to Court

 

In the defamation trial of Johnny Depp and his ex-wife Amber Heard, approximately 6,000 pages of pre-trial documents submitted to the court by the lawyers for both sides have been newly released, revealing that Johnny’s lawyer wanted Amber’s nude photos and her past as a stripper to be revealed in court. It was revealed that Johnny’s lawyer wanted Amber’s nude photos and her past as a stripper revealed in court.

 

According to U.S. Newsweek, in the filed documents, Amber’s lawyer said, “Mr. Depp intends to submit as evidence personal matters not relevant to the trial, including. (1) nude photos of Amber Heard; (2) footage of Amber Heard’s sister, Whitney Henriquez, on a reality TV show*; (3) Amber Heard’s romantic history with Whitney Henriquez; and (4) Amber Heard’s brief employment as an exotic dancer several years before meeting Mr. Depp. dancer for a short period of time before meeting Mr. Depp. Mr. Depp is attempting to lightly and maliciously suggest and imply that Mr. Amber Heard was an escort service,” he claims.

*When asked by a co-star on the show about the bruises on her body and whether “Amber did it to her,” Whitney allegedly replied, “I don’t want to talk about it.”

In the end, the judge upheld Amber’s claim that “the fact that Amber worked in a strip club when she was a lowly student had nothing to do with her relationship with Johnny. The nude photos were not admitted as evidence.

 

On the contrary, the documents released this time reveal that Amber’s lawyer tried to bring up Johnny’s erectile dysfunction (ED) in court and was rejected.

 

As many of you know, the verdict in the trial has already been reached, with the jury finding that Amber’s 2018 op-ed in the Washington Post was defamatory and ordering Amber to pay Johnny a total of $15 million in damages. Amber also won $2 million in damages in a counterclaim against Johnny. Amber’s side then appealed the verdict and filed a formal appeal. Johnny’s side appealed against the verdict.

 

 

Loading...

コメント