Last Updated on 08/05/2022 by てんしょく飯
In the trial in which Johnny Depp sued his ex-wife Amber Heard for defamation, documents submitted to the court before trial by lawyers for both sides were released, in which Amber’s lawyer claimed that “Johnny sexually assaulted Amber because he had erectile dysfunction (ED) ” and that he was claiming that he was “a good guy.
Amber Heard’s Lawyer Addresses Johnny Depp’s Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Issues
In the trial in which Johnny Depp sued his ex-wife, Amber Heard, for defamation, we have learned that Amber’s lawyers were trying to bring the issue of his lower body into court as evidence that Johnny sexually assaulted her.
Recently, approximately 6,000 pages of documents submitted to the court before trial by lawyers for both sides were released, in which Amber’s lawyer demanded that Johnny’s erectile dysfunction (ED) problems offended him and contributed to his sexual assault on Amber, and that a list of medications that proved Johnny had erectile dysfunction be The court found that he had demanded that a list of drugs be disclosed.
During the trial, Amber claimed that Johnny raped her with a bottle of alcohol, but according to Newweek, Amber’s lawyer said that there was a connection between Johnny’s such conduct and his erectile dysfunction, and that “Mr. Depp does not seem to want to disclose his erectile dysfunction. It is clear that such a condition led to Mr. Depp’s anger and his sexual assault of Amber Heard with a bottle. Mr. Depp’s complex about his erectile dysfunction turned into anger and frustration as he met with Amber Heard, and as a result, he resorted to using bottles,” he said in the document.
Incidentally, Johnny has consistently denied the sexual assault allegations made against him, and Johnny’s lawyers countered that it was “pure harassment” to bring up the erectile dysfunction story. Ultimately, the matter was never discussed in court. Johnny’s opposing attorneys also tried to submit nude photos of Amber and her past work at a strip club as evidence, but were rejected by the judge.
The verdict in the defamation trial has already been reached, with the jury finding that Amber’s 2018 op-ed in the Washington Post was defamatory and ordering Amber to pay a total of $15 million in damages to Johnny. Amber also won $2 million in damages in her counterclaim against Johnny.
Amber’s side then asked the court to set aside the verdict on the grounds that one of the jurors had been replaced by someone else, but the judge denied the motion, saying there was no evidence of fraud or wrongdoing on the part of the jurors. In response to that result, Amber’s side formally filed an appeal. In response, Johnny’s side also appealed the verdict of $2 million in damages.
コメント