Last Updated on 08/10/2022 by てんしょく飯
Some of Johnny Depp’s fans, hoping to get information that would be unfavorable to Amber Heard, pooled their money to obtain non-public documents of the trial, but as a result, it seems that it ended up damaging Johnny’s image.
Undisclosed documents from the trial do great damage to Johnny Depp
Recently, the undisclosed documents of the trial in which Johnny Depp sued his ex-wife Amber Heard for defamation were released.
The materials were obtained by Andrea Burkhart, an attorney who has been closely following the trial of Johnny and Amber and believes that Johnny was falsely accused. When she learned that the documents, which were closed to the public during the trial, totaled more than 6,000 pages and cost about $3,000 to make copies, she asked her Twitter followers (i.e., mainly Johnny’s fans) to donate to help her obtain the documents.
Burkhart and other fans who helped with the donation hoped that the information would be inconvenient for Amber, but this action backfired….
Below are the new facts revealed by the documents released.
Johnny Depp suffered from erectile dysfunction.
Amber’s lawyers had demanded that Johnny disclose a list of medications that proved he had erectile dysfunction (ED), claiming that Johnny’s ED problems had angered him and contributed to his sexual assault of Amber. During the trial, Amber testified that Johnny raped her with a bottle of alcohol, but her lawyers argued that there was a connection between Johnny’s engaging in such conduct and his erectile dysfunction.
In response, Johnny’s lawyers countered that it was “pure harassment” to bring up the erectile dysfunction. In the end, the matter was never discussed in court. Incidentally, Johnny’s medication history in the file included the name of a drug known to treat herpes, in addition to a drug for erectile dysfunction.
Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Plotted “Revenge Porn”
Johnny’s lawyers tried to present as evidence that Amber had worked in strip clubs in the past and nude photos of her, but the judge ultimately ruled that “Amber’s working in strip clubs when she was a lowlife had nothing to do with her relationship with Johnny. ” and upheld Amber’s side of the case. Nor were the nude photos admitted into evidence. Following the release of the information, the practice has been strongly criticized as revenge pornography, the release of sexual photos and videos of a former partner in an attempt to exact revenge.
Amber Heard refused to accept Johnny Depp’s partial property.
Because Johnny and Amber did not have a prenuptial agreement, as part of the property settlement, Amber was entitled to about half of Johnny’s fee for his role in the movie “Pirates of the Caribbean: The Last Pirates,” which he starred in during their marriage, but “I don’t want Johnny’s money He turned it down, saying, “I don’t want Johnny’s money. The documents included an email exchange between Amber and her lawyer that appeared to be from that time.
Some of Johnny Depp’s former agent’s testimony was “sealed.”
Tracy Jacobs, a former agent of Johnny Depp’s, said that during the filming of “Pirates of the Caribbean: The Last Airbender,” Disney executives were outraged by Johnny’s behavior while under the influence of alcohol and drugs at the time, and were told that he had “run out of patience. The trial court withheld part of the deposition testimony of Tracy Jacobs, a former agent of Johnny’s, who said that Disney executives were outraged by Johnny’s behavior and had “run out of patience.
Marilyn Manson introduced Johnny Depp to an 18-year-old woman.
In an e-mail exchange between Johnny’s friend, musician Marilyn Manson, and Johnny, Marilyn wrote, “My new fan, Meet and Greet girl. I need you. Trust me. I’ll send you a picture. 18 years old.” Marilyn offered to introduce Johnny to her groupie, an 18-year-old woman.
These are some of the new details we have learned. Johnny’s fans made the disclosure in order to get the inconvenient truth for Amber, and U.S. media such as Newsweek, Insider, and Rolling Stone reported that it was an act that damaged Johnny’s image.
Incidentally, as many of you know, the verdict in the trial has already been reached, with the jury finding that Amber’s 2018 op-ed in the Washington Post was defamatory and ordering Amber to pay a total of $15 million in damages to Johnny. Amber also won $2 million in damages in a counterclaim against Johnny. Amber’s side then appealed the verdict and filed a formal appeal. Johnny’s side appealed against the verdict.
コメント